The When of it all

Cheryl asked some really good questions:

<<Do you have specific time scheduled for presentations and observing the dc? What do the older dc do during this? How do you keep the younger dc quiet and busy while the olders are doing their work? >>

I have to preface my answer by saying what I do now is not what I did when most of the children in the house were under school age.  Right now, we do have a scheduled seat work time in the mornings. The older children take turns playing with Brendan for half hr intervals so the rest of us can work together.  I rotate through the other children getting them started on independent work and listening to them read or drilling math facts, checking work, etc. Aidan and Kieran also work on their manipulatives and games – usually at the kitchen island which is too high for Brendan to reach. The table is just asking for trouble! <g>

When my oldest began homeschooling we had a baby and 3yo in the mix. I didn’t attempt to do a set school time during the day though we did do lots of library story hours, walks, art work, manips, and so on. Allen would give the babies a bath after dinner and Colin and I would do any concentrated learning like phonics and math then. It was plenty of time for a very young student. Later we added his brothers’ nap time. By the time those times weren’t enough we had kids old enough to start taking turns with the current baby.

So my big thought?  Get lots of self instructional materials for starters. If a good chunk of your curriculum requires interpretation by the teacher there is a problem. It is the curriculum’s problem however – not your family’s! Ditch it if you plan to continue to grow your family. Be flexible on when things happen. There are often lulls through the day when littles wear out, take naps, or lay low for a span.  Tuck learning into those times rather than trying to squeeze your toddlers into a pre-set academic schedule.

As to the Grace and Courtesy presentations – I tend to unschool these <g>.  Can we unschool Montessori?  I guess I do.  While we are getting cleaned up in the bathroom I might say "hey, do you remember how we open and shut the cabinet door?" (insert demo) When we getting ready to run errands I might say, "How do we behave in the store?"  Some time before expecting guests you can role play things like welcoming and sharing toys.

We also like to occasionally bring up ‘dilemmas’.  For instance a sub had told me the children in my co-op preschool room were beginning to get a bit rowdy. When I returned to class we started with our story as usual, then before going to the trays we talked about the room rules (one material at a time, one child per material, taking turns) they all rattled off the rules. Then I asked them to consider possible situations like, "What if you REALLY want the game a friend is playing?"  "What if they are taking a LONG time to finish?" After thinking through how they would handle these scenarios they all did remarkably well at handling them when they occurred.

Drilling these things works well at home too. They get a charge out of practicing it seems and remembering the appropriate way to do things. Aidan came up to me Friday morning and said,"Every time you ask me a question today I am going to say ‘Yes, mom!’" A delightful prospect <g> 

Observations?  All the time. The kids are kinda hard to miss. ; )  Seriously though, a notebook helps if you have a lot going on. You can make notes to yourself as little problems arise like ‘work on please and thank you’  ‘need to practice looking adults in the eye’ ‘towels on the floor – work on how to hang them this wk’. I try not to ‘go off’ the first time I notice problems but use that as a springboard for demos and discussion in the coming days.

I will say it helps tremendously to catch them remembering the right way to do a thing and to comment about it. A simple "Wow you are really careful shutting the cupboard door," or "You shook Mr Jones hand when he introduced himself, that was really brave!"  really makes their day and encourages them to practice what they learned.

Hope that helps, Cheryl! 

Adj cards

Adj_game_m We have been making sentence analysis materials this month.  Thought I would share the logical adjective exercise Moira and Aidan were playing.  The cards are color-coded by part of speech. They go nouns (black) first and then the adjectives. In this pic Moira is matching adjectives to nouns.

What do you suppose it is about our kids and the tongue thing while concentrating lol?

What is Montessori Anyway?

Montessori Mom linked to this site this weekend and I am linking to it also in case you missed it. The Montessori Discovery School has an excellent, concise overview of the method, terminology, and goals for elementary level students.

If the next question is "Why do I care?" you might like to read the results of this study which showed Montessori trained children were head and shoulders ahead of their age-mates in both academic and social/emotional areas as compared to children in non-Montessori schools. Particularly noteworthy to relaxed homeschoolers was the comment that althought they were  "not regularly tested or graded, they did just as well in spelling, punctuation and grammar exams as those given conventional lessons."  This doesn’t have to be painful folks. ; )

So You Wanna…learn something?

I am knee deep in file cabinets and filing system set up this wknd so am sending another link for grins. The So You Wanna site is like a "For Dummies" online. It has cheat sheets and short explanations of all sorts of basic educational topics like avoiding writing errors, delivering a speech, interpreting poetry, etc.  The ettiquette section has additional edu-categories, but do but careful with some of the other categories.  A few of the topics are definitely not those you would want to share with children.  Consider yourself forewarned <g>

and yet more

pRebecca commented about fantasy play:

<<How would you discourage them from doing so? Would you? I just can’t imagine being able to do it. In theory I could but it would be difficult in reality. >>

   I think this is where the confusion arises.  Fantasy play would be considered more of an indicator than an end in itself.  Akin to attacking a fever without addressing the underlying trigger.  Like you said, it is more prevalent after tv viewing.  In our family it is way more prevalent after stressful times or times when the little ones are left to their own devices. 

   We have found that, just as the articles suggest, our small people resort to fantasy play less as the opportunity to do ‘real stuff’ increases. If they can prepare real food and serve a real family – and it can be done!- they eagerly abandon the toy kitchen. If they have sports equipment they will generally choose to play real games. If they have help working with the horses they will trade the toy animals for real any day. Now animals may not be available but usually yards are and real tools can have their handles cut down for smaller hands.

   Ditto cleaning tools. Rebecca says,"Everyone is willing to repair the fence with a hammer and nails but no one want to sweep the floors."  Sometimes it’s the accessories that seal the deal lol! Individualized chore aprons, a personal set of tools and nontoxic cleaners etc. Moreover I think the European Montessori school linked to yesterday said it best when explaining the practical life activities – the motion of scrubbing the table and the suds created are both more important to the preschool child than the end effect of a clean table.  To me this is the whole point of prepared practical life activities. Rather than being artificial they serve as a sort of mental and physical calisthenic to refine motions, a lab of sorts. No one likes to do a job they are not able to do well. Practical life trays can be an important precursor to effective real life helping.

   Likewise the school says that children "spontaneously and naturally seek order".  This may not be evident at home though I noticed that when it was not it was usually due to the fact that we had gotten snowed under with stuff. Once they have a space that they are able to maintain they tend to do so much more willingly.  This was driven home to me last night. We took the toys out of the boys bedroom. Some had migrated back in during the wknd and there was a mini-tornado left from church prep since we had gone to the park after church last week and had not put one pair of church shoes away properly. It looked daunting but the boys knew where everything went and didn’t fuss over picking up. Aidan even remarked LOOK Dad, that didn’t take long at all to pick up!!  this is rather revolutionary in my life. <g> Huge incentive to stick to the routines and continue the purging.

   So bottom line,I try to keep the little ones right with us doing meaningful things like carrying the library bks or helping bathe and dress the real baby. Read about real people who did fascinating things. They get the impression early on that they, and their contributions, are greatly valued and that they positively impact the family.  This is important because when left to themselves they tend to get mischievous and they quickly sense that they are a liability rather than a blessing. We work to be  blessing – all of us. All of us are coming around to cultivating a deep appreciation of our roles in maintaining our environment. (yes, mom too!)

   Anyway, no I wouldn’t discourage the play. I would use it as a gauge to see if it may indicate a need for less tv (no tv?) or less stimulation (clutter, over-scheduling) or more satisfying activities.  I think once we read the method over and over we generally know when we are dealing with a proper use of imagination and when it signifies a deviation or a stress reduction technique.  A good measure would be our comfort level.  I don’t allow for fantasy play with school materials. That would be a good example.  If they don’t understand a concept or are over(or under)stimulated in an exercise it tends to disintegrate into sword fighting or tossing the pieces about the table. Actually this happens with toys as well. IMO,that is normally my cue that something is amiss, rather than a sign of immense creativity.<g> If they were playing St George slaying the dragon I would be tempted to smile and leave them be.

   It is usually easy to discern if you are dealing with reenactment – which I would interpret as the child working out the functions of different roles – and disordered play. In the latter they are still working internal things out but it might signal to us a need to assess the environment.

Use of fantasy and imagination among Montessori kids

Wi   It is a fairly common concern among Montessori parents and critics of the method that Montessori discouraged imaginative play. Willa, whom I deeply respect, rightly questions why this might be in her blog entry. If the purpose of redirecting the child to reality is arbitrary, and based only on the directress’ preferred use of the materials then it is highly inappropriate. Our motivation in teaching should never be to impose our subjective preferences upon the child for no other reason than that we prefer them. But I think Montessori’s opinions about fantasy play stem from deeper observations, whether or not all contemporary Montessorian’s articulate it well.
   The authors of Natural Structure address this same issue in their comparison of various early childhood educational methods. They encourage readers to explore the origins of their preconceptions of childhood. "The concept of play and imagination according to Froebel and Montessori is also worth looking at in depth," they believe because Froebel’s  theories have become such an integral part of contemporary educational systems. As such they may be influencing our opinions about young children whether we realize it or not. They go on to quote Dorothy Sayers, a classical educator, who describes Froebel’s goal of "breaking down of all distinctions and forms… the flowing together in the universe in one great whole." Indeed many imagination-based early education methods consider themselves to be ‘wholistic’ for this reason. Sayers explains that Montessori tends to be Catholic and latin in origin and "presents a universe with definite and abiding forms, eternally distinct, and distinct from its Creator."
   Montessori herself says this: "Adults, even thought they punish or patiently tolerate the errant and unruly actions of these disordered children, actually favor and encourage their fantasies, interpreting them as the creative tendencies of a child’s mind.  Froebel invented many of his games to encourage the development of a child’s imagination along these lines… Toys furnish a child with an environment that has no particular goal and , as a consequence, they cannot provide it with any real mental concentration but only illusions…. ‘divided’ children of this sort are regarded, particularly in school, as being highly intelligent, evne if they lack order, neatness, and discipline."
   Silvia Dubovoy, PhD has an essay online called Reality, the Most Powerful and Integral Key to the World. She elaborates about the qualities of reality and fantasy and what roles both play in the development of children. She does not forbid fantasy but challenges readers to consider the most optimal timing for introduction of fantasy – generally after the child is well grounded in reality in the second plane of development which roughly occurs between ages  6 and 12. She includes quotes from Plato suggesting we avoid stories that can create the  “the presence of falsehood in the soul concerning reality. To be deceived about the truth of things and so to be in ignorance and error and to harbor untruth in the soul is a thing no-one would consent to” (The Republic, Book II). She concludes that "He believed that the stories children hear early in their lives have a profound influence on them."
   The belief that runs through her essay is that fantasy play usually occurs in children "who are living stressed lives in constrained environments, full of traffic and pollution; traveling long distances in cars; with working parents that do not have the time to be with them; or with parents that, when they are with their children, besides overprotecting them, are busy with their own complicated life (including the latest cellular telephone or computer). For these children, it is extremely difficult to find work that can engage their attention or concentration."  Unfortunately this can be true of homeschoolers as well much as any other segment of the population. Many parents and teachers are dealing with taxing situations that demand their attention. Toys and entertainment are a tempting solution to the time crunch dilemma. She questions whether this is a good longterm option however.
    Now at this point it would likely be good to make a distinction. Montessori also believed that fantasy play was more prevalent in children who had developmental difficulties.  From my reading I get the impression that while they would redirect the child back to the reality of a situation or a material they wouldn’t and couldn’t force a child to abandon their fantasy play. That the Montessorian would percieve as a natural side effect of the normalization process.  It would come on its own. Likewise, the introduction of fantasy stories etc (again in my opinion) would fall under a different category.
   Duboyvoy makes  a clear distinction between fantasy and imagination as well, a distinction which is critical to the argument and is often blurred among adults today. Imagination is properly defined as Willa did when she says that "..investing of objects with imaginary significance is a rudimentary use of symbolism which is a wonderful human capacity". Dubovoy and other Montessorians would likely concur, though they would tend to believe that this capacity is best developed by ample reality based experiences in the first plane (ages 0-6).  This is in line with Sayer’s and other classical educators who consider the early years to be a time of concrete learning followed by the abilty to grasp more abstract thought.
   European Montessori School explains it as ‘building imagination with the real’. They assert that ‘imagination can have  only a sensorial basis’. They believe that accurate understanding of the qualities of real things is part of the process of ‘collecting from the real world the material for imagination’.
   So, lots to chew on here. We have our basic challenge to discern the origin of our opinions on the matter and whether we are in fact basing those opinions upon prevailing cultural norms and/or our personal religious beliefs (and fwiw I would consider the latter to be a justified basis for these opinions regardless of which side of the fence we would then fall upon).  Then to make the distinction between early fantasy play and authentic imagination development.  Finally to determine how all of this may impact the choices we make in our children’s playthings and pastimes. Ultimately it may be worth considering whether our schedules and use of time is contributing to or hindering our child’s grounding in reality. Hmm.  Better go milk a goat on that note!

Lapbooks, life skills, Montessori, and special needs

I promised Dani I would upload my links today.  In looking around I was intrigued by the success stories of Montessori kids with special needs. We have two delightful little boys visiting us this week while their parents attend a funeral out of town. While visiting when they got dropped off she was sharing about the dyslexia curricula they used for an older boy years back.  It sounded remarkably like Montessori as well. Tracing letters, visual cues, etc.  Anyway, we have been busy here this week so will just jump to the links:

Do 2 Learn life skill clip art.  These can be used a lot of ways.  You can make wall charts such as these and these  or use them for lapbook lessons like Dani plans to.

The Preschool Power tapes teach by showing rather than by telling. They are offering a special price through the end of Sept for teachers of special needs children.  Don’t miss these!!!  They are awesome for all preschoolers and for their parents who want a visual presentation of Montessori lessons. Nothing like having lessons at the ready on your VCR.

I am including an article  about Montessori being used for Autistic children.  In this one Montessori Mom answers some questions about using the method for special needs.  Here is a very encouraging story written by a young lady who has Down’s Syndrome.  She presented this testimony to the entire school in a speech given during Disability Awareness Week.

and finally LOTS of lapbooking links! I am very happy to be able to share several links to free templates and fold directions. Now you really can try before you buy: 

Tamy Duby has a visually appealing new site called Lapbook Ladies

At Scrapbooking to Learn you can access fold directions for the file folders and booklets.

a few more can be found here, not many but I really like her illustrations <g>

Candle in the Window is another how-to site.  (Crossover content with Scrapbook to Learn)

Mirkwood Designs has tons of templates to download and resize to your needs.  These are designed as cards so there is a great deal of potential here for all kinds of projects. There is nothing so nice as ‘press and print’ imo!

And should you want it just that easy you can check out Hands of a Child.  They sell lapbooking kits along with topical study guides for a host of subjects. If you click on a title you can pull up a free downloadable sample for each.

If you want more more more then ck out the yahoo lapbooking group. They have oodles of shared images in the picture files for the group.

Hope that helps, Dani!   Back to school here!  : )

How to Think about Homeschooling

   While surfing around Fuller Farm yesterday I saw a link to what may be the most significant article I have read about homeschooling in a very long time.  Perhaps THE most. Cumberland Books has an excellent article by Rick Saenz about How to Think About Homeschooling. The author begins by having us determine the purpose for our lives.  He goes on to discuss the content and means of education. He explains that his approach is less of an approach and more of an attitude. Thought provoking!

   His basis premise is that for his family the purpose of life is to be a godly person, marry a godly spouse, raise a godly family. This goal is not for the fortunate few but within the grasp of any called to it.

   Another truism he shares is that given such a goal, not all children need to study the same thing. In fact he goes so far as to say that which particular set of knowledge and skills (and we all must be knowledgeable and skilled in something) we choose to pass on can and should have less to do with what others think is critical and everything to do with our own family’s legacy and traditions. This idea is at the same time liberating and challenging because while it means there is no one ‘off the shelf’ curriculum that will be created with just the content and balance that your family may require it does mean that your chosen path need not, and should not, look like ‘ your neighbor or cousin or fellow parishioner’. And, ‘it will ultimately be up to you to find it’. Amen to that.

   He asks us to consider why it is we are teaching a given course. He doesn’t offer a pat answer to that question and asserts that there may well be a very good reason behind our choice. He simply urges us to avoid choosing to do so simply because we feel a vague obligation. He reminds us that there are few skills which cannot be learned once the need for them becomes apparent. What cannot be learned later is character. Lapses in that department follow an individual forever and cannot be made up down the road. Therefore, its entirely possible we may choose to pursue a less palatable subject, less because it is ‘necessary’ and more because the process of learning it helps with the vital skills of learning ‘how to think abstractly; how to apply oneself to a task that is difficult and doesn’t yield immediate tangible benefits; how to submit to his mother’s authority; how to keep to a schedule’.  I cannot even say why it is so important to me. If the end result is that we all still cover geometry what was the point of taking the decision apart? I guess for me the point is living life on purpose and knowing WHY you are a doing a thing. Better yet, having your student know why. A simple ‘because’ rarely flies for a teen, nor for any of us really.

   The most significant piece of advice he shares, if you can rightly call it advice, is that if godly living is your goal there are a lotta ways to skin this cat. For some of us that may look more academic or more vocational. The content is less important than the purpose – though there must be content. He advises us to be true to ourselves, our families and our traditions.  This is a radically countercultural position to take in many places today. I am reminded of the German mother who was imprisoned yesterday, her husband compelled to flee the country, because they were guilty of believing in a parent’s right to educate their own children, a crime of "high treason" in Germany. Not many of us both articulate our purpose and maintain such an unwaivering commitment to it.

   At any rate, if you have a few moments, check the article out at Cumberland Books. You can also find some thoughtful titles on simple living and agrarian lifestyle tucked here and there at their site.

   In the funny way life has of bringing related thoughts together for me, we read a wonderful short story aloud yesterday, Leo Tolstoy’s Three Questions. It seems to me that homeschoolers and mothers in general often ask themselves variations of those same three questions – "who are the right people to listen to, whom to avoid, and what is the right thing to be doing at a given moment?"  In fact those questions are ultimately the cause of many anxious catalog readings, many pangs over scheduling, and more anquish over methodology than one could imagine. In the end Tolstoy affirms that now is the most important time, because it is the only time over which we have any power; the most important person is the one we are with; and the most important deed is to do him well.  To me the overarching theme here is that it IS in fact ok to be responsive, to address the immediate needs presented to us, and to allow tomorrow to unfold as it will. If we do our part today we can rest assured that our tomorrows will flow steadily from our diligence and intention.