How will we be remembered?

I have thought a good deal about Lady Lydia’s wardrobe comment in recent days. It isn’t about specific prints or whatnot, but rather what kinds of images we are planting in others’ minds, particularly those of our children and grandchildren.

Dressing up in pretty dresses was important to me, because I didn’t want my family to have memories of me in the same old thing day after day, looking oppressed and tired. Today I have Miss Lillian and the boys around me a lot, and I want them to remember their grandmother wearing the enchanting little cotton prints and clear colors, with the trims and buttons and laces, my hair done up, and even pretty shoes.

This post was read shortly after overhearing another conversation while shopping for fabric for more dresses for Tess. While I worked my way through the bolts of material there were two women talking to each other over the pattern books. One was considerably further down the room so their voices were heard by all. There were many comments such as, “Well THIS would be s@xy, don’t you think?” or “Do you think this is s@xy?” In fact that seemed to be the one adjective to make or break their purchase. I could almost expect this from silly girls but I was taken aback to turn the corner and discover women who must have been 30 seriously embroiled in this discussion.

Now don’t get me wrong. I don’t think our goal is to be asexual or frumpy. If we are married our first goal is to be attractive to our spouse. Still, there is a difference between sexuality and beauty. Beauty can also be alluring, but sexuality alone does not guarantee beauty. In fact it can be downright repulsive on its own without the anchor of loveliness.

Friends and I have discussed the bigger issue of how we will be remembered by our children and their children and yes, by our spouses. Debi Pearl recalls picking berries with her grandfather when she was little. All the way down the row he was telling her how beautiful her grandmother was. All these thoughts came together as I stood in the aisle and realized this isn’t a ‘today’ decision, it is a long reaching choice which will ripple in time.

As Helen says, we are inundated with messages about what it means to be a woman today. If we don’t critically examine them it is easy to get swept away along the current. Beauty is rarely part of the equation as evidenced by the overheard conversation. It is all about the ‘other’ which is the only yardstick many women have. We have been so soaked in these messages we may not be able to properly discern true beauty.

Jen and I have pondered Lady Lydia’s challenge to think about the adjectives used to decribe women of old and women today. It was once a common practice to compare women to flowers. As she points out, yesterday’s softness is replaced by ‘cutting edge’ and ‘sharp’. Are these the images that inspired that old man to adore his wife? Is perpetual adolescence the best response to growing older? Is ‘hardness’ our goal?

My own grandmother has been a good example to me. Never frumpy, she always was pulled together whether for housework or a trip to town, nothing extravagant but her appearance was always cared for, her signature scent (Estee) wafting behind her. Her demeanor called for respect and admiration. I wonder how grandmothers of today and the grandmothers WE are going to be compare?

We are more than our appearance and yet, our appearances will live on in our family’s minds when we are gone. When they are left with memories and photographs what will they have? Will they see confident, beautiful women, lovelier with each decade, at peace with the season in which they find themselves? We can be that. While we can’t be 17 forever we can forever wear our very best asset – a smile. We can nurture our finest attributes – gentleness, understanding, care for others. We can be stewards of our outsides as well, caring for our skin, our hair, our wardrobes; making choices that reflect our vision. Any basic communications course will explain that our appearance sends a message about what is important to us. What message are we sending?

“It sometimes happens that a woman is handsomer at 29 than ten years before.” – Jane Austen

“Character contributes to beauty. It fortifies a woman as her youth fades. A mode of conduct, a standard of courage, discipline, fortitude, and integrity can do a great deal to make a woman beautiful.”

“The difference between pretty and beautiful is-
pretty is temporal-whereas beautiful is eternal.”

“For the rest, brethren, whatsoever things are true, whatsoever modest, whatsoever just, whatsoever holy, whatsoever lovely, whatsoever of good fame, if there be any virtue, if any praise of discipline, think on these things.” Phil 4:8 (Douay Rheims)

8 thoughts on “How will we be remembered?

  1. I’m actually commenting because I disagree and that surprises me. I was thinking of the my mother and my grandmother and my favorite outfits of theirs were rather shabby. My mother always did have circles around her eyes. I see that in photos but I see that as beautiful – it was evidence of the way she worked to support her six children both emotionally and also financially as a nurse. With my grandmother is was a frumpy old turquoise housecoat – not beautiful in itself, but beautiful to me still because I loved her.
    I don’t know… maybe I’m missing your point. And I’m sitting here in an old shirt and boxers, but appearances have never been that important to me. I can’t seem to create interest in that sort of thing. I believe in being modest and wouldn’t describe my clothing as cutting edge – more plain and practical because I want to do more than I want to appear.
    And I hope I don’t offend by disagreeing because you know I have genuine affection and respect for you – I hope this comes across as discussion and not criticism.

  2. Y’all we are starting school so just want to hop on and clarify since I may not get back here for a bit. I don’t think this has to be an either/or scenario. We don’t have to choose between being modest/practical and being attractive, nor between our insides and our outsides. I do think it is important to work at both, particularly if we are married. And yet, we don’t have to sacrifice true beauty, which Jennifer pts out transcends our appearances, in a futile quest for ongoing s@x appeal either which is the bigger question I was considering.
    We do have to make time for self care but there is always time for loveliness whether personal or in our homes. Otherwise we are reduced to meer utilitarianism which is rather joyless in any area.

  3. I think we probably agree on this subject far more than we disagree Kim. I was wondering as I read how this plays out in our home. And certainly I advocate taking care of oneself physically. I’m run and work out, I’m in good shape. I whiten my teeth and wear make up. I like to smell nice. I look nice at Mass and when I go out, but on a day to day basis, it’s shabby t-shirts. 🙂 This topic is interesting particularly for home schooling moms who more often than not are at home and have no demands placed upon their appearance.
    Anyway, thanks for a thought provoking post (and a pleasant discussion!)

  4. interesting,as always Kim. My grandmother never traded in her skirts and worn her “everyday” pearls nearly every day. I love her old photos and can smell her coffee and bread and cookies from looking at a picture. Isn’t that funny? That’s what I remember, a lovely spotless home, great home-cooking, and beautiful clothes. I am pretty darned sure my kids will remember a slightly frumpy mom, a constant battle against a messy home but lots and lots of books and lessons! Oh, and gardens and growing stuff. You do a great job of looking wonderful all the time. Not sure HOW you do it, but you do a wonderful job. 🙂

  5. I think the message Lydia Sherman, Emilie Barnes, and even Flylady have tried to send is that, while we don’t have the same outside demands on our appearance, this IS a dignified profession (homemaking) and how we dress for the role gives some indication of what value we place on it. Unfortunately in our day careful grooming is usually reserved for paid occupations.
    The second issue is that of middle aged and older women (I am including my own generation here) whose highest goal for their appearance is to arouse men. Ick. That is not how I wish to be remembered.Give me ladylike any day. I think it’s more attractive in the long run as well as dignified and proper to our vocation.
    It also speaks to more noble responses in our men. We don’t always realize that it is no less demeaning to men than to ourselves to appeal only to a man’s physical response. While it is an admittedly strong drive, it is not all a man is made of either. We sell them short when that is all we can think of to attract their attention.

Leave a reply to J.C. Cancel reply